Lear, Siegler, Seymour Corp. v. Zaino
95 Ohio St. 3d 1456
This text of 95 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Lear, Siegler, Seymour Corp. v. Zaino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lear, Siegler, Seymour Corp. v. Zaino, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2002).
Opinion
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-J-897. On motion of Edward Bernert for admission pro hac vice of Kerne Matsubara on behalf of Leai, Seigler, Seymour Corp. and on motion of Edward Bernert for admission pro hac vice of Jeffrey Vesely on behalf of Lear, Siegler, Seymour Corp. Motions granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lear-siegler-seymour-corp-v-zaino-ohio-2002.