Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball

Ninth Circuit

Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball

863 F.2d 693

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 22, 1988·No. Nos. 86-6496, 87-5698 and 87-5670·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, [694] REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, [694] REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball, 863 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

863 F.2d 693 (Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Lear Siegler, Inc., Energy Products Division, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross v. William L. Ball, Iii, Secretary of the Navy, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees. Lear Siegler Inc., and United States Senate United States House of Representatives, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. William L. Ball, Iii, Secretary of the Navy William Stevenson, Contracting Officer

863 F.2d 693 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)

Opinion

Related