Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball

863 F.2d 693
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 1988
DocketNos. 86-6496, 87-5698 and 87-5670
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 863 F.2d 693 (Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Ball, 863 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

ORDER

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, [694]*694REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 F.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lear-siegler-inc-v-ball-ca9-1988.