Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC

Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC

690 N.W.2d 103, 2004 WL 3007285
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 29, 2004·No. 127409·Published

Opinion

690 N.W.2d 103 (2004)

LEAR CORP.
v.
BUTZEL LONG, PC.

No. 127409.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 29, 2004.

SC: 127409, COA: 258669.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. The motion to admit Kimball R. Anderson, Charles B. Molster, III, Carol A. Joffe, and Anne W. Stukes pro hac vice is also considered, and it is GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC, 690 N.W.2d 103, 2004 WL 3007285 (Mich. 2004).

690 N.W.2d 103 (Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.