Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC
This text of 690 N.W.2d 103 (Lear Corp. v. BUTZEL LONG, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LEAR CORP.
v.
BUTZEL LONG, PC.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 127409, COA: 258669.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. The motion to admit Kimball R. Anderson, Charles B. Molster, III, Carol A. Joffe, and Anne W. Stukes pro hac vice is also considered, and it is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 N.W.2d 103, 2004 WL 3007285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lear-corp-v-butzel-long-pc-mich-2004.