Leaphart v. City of Detroit

759 N.W.2d 392

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leaphart v. City of Detroit. Read the opinion of the Court — 766 N.W.2d 852 →

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 2009·No. 136662·Published

Opinion

759 N.W.2d 392 (2009)

Kirk LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and
Derald Penn and Marcus Williams, Defendants-Appellees.
Kirk Leaphart, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
City of Detroit, Defendant, and
Gregory Sawmiller, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 136662, 136663. COA Nos. 285146, 285147.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2008 orders of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

759 N.W.2d 392 (2009)

Kirk LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and
Derald Penn and Marcus Williams, Defendants-Appellees.
Kirk Leaphart, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
City of Detroit, Defendant, and
Gregory Sawmiller, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 136662, 136663. COA Nos. 285146, 285147.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

Leaphart v. City of Detroit, 759 N.W.2d 392 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

759 N.W.2d 392 (Leaphart v. City of Detroit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Kirk LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and Derald Penn and Marcus Williams, Defendants-Appellees. Kirk Leaphart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Detroit, Defendant, and Gregory Sawmiller, Defendant-Appellee.

Order

Kirk LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and
Derald Penn and Marcus Williams, Defendants-Appellees.
Kirk Leaphart, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
City of Detroit, Defendant, and
Gregory Sawmiller, Defendant-Appellee.