LeAnthony Winston v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6337 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6337

LEANTHONY T. WINSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia D.O.C.; RENALD MEYERS, Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail; CARL MANIS, Warden of Wallens Ridge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LeAnthony T. Winston, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6337 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

LeAnthony T. Winston appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for

entry of a default judgment and his subsequent motion to alter or amend the judgment. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Clarke, No. 2:17-cv-00566-RGD-DEM

(E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2022; filed Mar. 11, 2022 & entered Mar. 14, 2022). We further deny

Winston’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED