LeAnn Randall v. Goodall & Davison, P.C. and J. Mark Avery
This text of LeAnn Randall v. Goodall & Davison, P.C. and J. Mark Avery (LeAnn Randall v. Goodall & Davison, P.C. and J. Mark Avery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00005-CV
LeAnn Randall, Appellant
v.
Goodall & Davison, P.C. and J. Mark Avery, Appellees
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 09-0430-CP4-C, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING
O R D E R
PER CURIAM
Counsel for appellee J. Mark Avery has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw and substitute counsel, asking that Jeffrey R. Jury and the law firm Burns, Anderson, Jury & Brenner, L.L.P. be permitted to withdraw from representing him and that Clark Richards and the law firm Richards Rodriguez & Skeith, L.L.P. be substituted as J. Mark Avery's counsel. We grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5.
It is ordered February 10, 2012.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LeAnn Randall v. Goodall & Davison, P.C. and J. Mark Avery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leann-randall-v-goodall-davison-pc-and-j-mark-aver-texapp-2012.