Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.

874 N.W.2d 243

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 3, 2016

DocketA15-1239

StatusPublished

This text of 874 N.W.2d 243 (Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors., 874 N.W.2d 243 (Mich. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 1, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/_ David L. Lillehaug Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI