Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.

874 N.W.2d 243
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 3, 2016·No. A15-1239·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 1, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/_ David L. Lillehaug Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors., 874 N.W.2d 243 (Mich. 2016).

874 N.W.2d 243 (Leanda Muhonen, Relator v. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)