Lean v. Leeds

114 A. 402, 92 N.J. Eq. 455, 7 Stock. 455, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 235
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

[460]*460For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Savayze, Trenct-iard,Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbacíi, White, I-Ieppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lean v. Leeds, 114 A. 402, 92 N.J. Eq. 455, 7 Stock. 455, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 235 (N.J. 1921).

114 A. 402 (Lean v. Leeds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Becker v. Sunrise at Elkridge
543 A.2d 977 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Ocean Cape Hotel Corp. v. Masefield Corp.
164 A.2d 607 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
River Development Corp. v. Liberty Corp.
133 A.2d 373 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Gottlaub v. Cohen
51 A.2d 254 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Stillman Hoag, Inc. v. Peeck
34 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Hildinger v. Bishop
8 A.2d 813 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Miller v. Headley
158 A. 118 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
Church v. Bruce
251 P. 854 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)