Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker

Fourth Circuit

Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker

72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39560, 1995 WL 752836

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 20, 1995·No. 95-7216·Published

Opinion

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leamon PARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN; Louis R. Colombo; Cecelia M. Goetz;
Juanita H. Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7216.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Leamon Partin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Partin v. Freeman, No. CA-95-588-5 (E.D.N.C. July 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

72 F.3d 127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leamon PARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Franklin FREEMAN; Louis R. Colombo; Cecelia M. Goetz;
Juanita H. Baker, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7216.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 7, 1995.
Decided Dec. 20, 1995.

Leamon Partin, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER and HALL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Partin v. Freeman, No. CA-95-588-5 (E.D.N.C. July 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker, 72 F.3d 127, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39560, 1995 WL 752836 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

72 F.3d 127 (Leamon Partin v. Franklin Freeman Louis R. Colombo Cecelia M. Goetz Juanita H. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.