Leaming v. Fox

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 10, 2013·No. Civil Action No. 2013-0042·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

FILED

3 KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING, ) 1 o d ) g\ rk, U.S. District an Piaintirf, ) %v“\<'“\“°*' C°“"‘S ) v ) Civil Action No. 13-0042 ) JACK FOX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the

Court would consider the plaintiffs complaint and application to proceed z`rz forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). Although the plaintiff has submitted an additional documents (including an amended complaint), to date he has not submitted the required financial information. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to

proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/t,yr rf

United St£tes District Judge

DATE; (@/*/!/}@}(Z)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leaming v. Fox, (D.D.C. 2013).

Leaming v. Fox (Leaming v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.