Leaming v. Fox
This text of Leaming v. Fox (Leaming v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FILED
3 KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING, ) 1 o d ) g\ rk, U.S. District an Piaintirf, ) %v“\<'“\“°*' C°“"‘S ) v ) Civil Action No. 13-0042 ) JACK FOX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the
Court would consider the plaintiffs complaint and application to proceed z`rz forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). Although the plaintiff has submitted an additional documents (including an amended complaint), to date he has not submitted the required financial information. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to
proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/t,yr rf
United St£tes District Judge
DATE; (@/*/!/}@}(Z)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leaming v. Fox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leaming-v-fox-dcd-2013.