Leal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leal v. State

424 So. 2d 829, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21383

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1982

DocketNo. 81-928

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 424 So. 2d 829 (Leal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leal v. State, 424 So. 2d 829, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leal appeals from his convictions for trafficking in methaqualone and conspiracy, arguing that the trial court erred in denying suppression of certain physical evidence.

We adopt the reasoning and holding from our opinion in the appeal of appellant’s codefendant, tried separately, Juan Acebo. Acebo v. State, 415 So.2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Holding there to be no error in the denial of suppression below, or otherwise, we affirm the convictions.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leal appeals from his convictions for trafficking in methaqualone and conspiracy, arguing that the trial court erred in denying suppression of certain physical evidence.

We adopt the reasoning and holding from our opinion in the appeal of appellant’s codefendant, tried separately, Juan Acebo. Acebo v. State, 415 So.2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Holding there to be no error in the denial of suppression below, or otherwise, we affirm the convictions.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 So. 2d 829, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leal-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack