Leal v. Knife River Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Leal v. Knife River Corp.

909 N.W.2d 595

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 10, 2018

DocketA17-0527

StatusPublished

This text of 909 N.W.2d 595 (Leal v. Knife River Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leal v. Knife River Corp., 909 N.W.2d 595 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals, filed March 3, 2017, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) ("Summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view. They do no more than establish the law of the case.").

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

Lorie S. Gildea

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals, filed March 3, 2017, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) ("Summary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view. They do no more than establish the law of the case.").

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ ______________________________

Lorie S. Gildea

Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 N.W.2d 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leal-v-knife-river-corp-minn-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack