Leal v. Federal Election Commission

94 F. App'x 846
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 21, 2004·No. No. 03-5330·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 24, 2003, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, its claims are clearly baseless, and the action is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii); Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827,104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leal v. Federal Election Commission, 94 F. App'x 846 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

94 F. App'x 846 (Leal v. Federal Election Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)