Leaks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Leaks v. State

521 S.W.3d 295, 2017 WL 2644408, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 607

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2017·No. No. ED 104964·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathon Leaks appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathon Leaks appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Leaks v. State, 521 S.W.3d 295, 2017 WL 2644408, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 607 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

521 S.W.3d 295 (Leaks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.