Leakhana Uong v. Loretta E. Lynch

649 F. App'x 507
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 2016
Docket15-70301
StatusUnpublished

This text of 649 F. App'x 507 (Leakhana Uong v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leakhana Uong v. Loretta E. Lynch, 649 F. App'x 507 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leakhana Uong, a native, and citizen of Cambodia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1262. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 786, 791 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review.

The BIA abused its discretion in denying Uong’s motion to reopen on the ground that her evidence “merely list[ed] the same address” as her spouse, where she provided substantially more evidence of the bona fides of her marriage than the BIA’s decision indicated. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(e)(3). We remand for the agency to redetermine whether Uong has presented clear and convincing evidence of a bona fide marriage.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
649 F. App'x 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leakhana-uong-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.