Leake v. Talbert

82 F. App'x 302
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2003·No. No. 03-7332·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jesse Leake, a North Carolina inmate, appeals from the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that Leake’s motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction be denied. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order appealed from is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leake v. Talbert, 82 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2003).

82 F. App'x 302 (Leake v. Talbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)