Leak v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Leak v. Smith

1 Ga. L. Rep. 327

DecidedJuly 1, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 327 (Leak v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leak v. Smith, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 327 (Ga. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, J.

The order of the chancellor upon this application for injunction, though not in the terms of complainants prayee, keeps the subject matter in dispute in the position ip which it was found when the bill was brought, and protects every interest of the contending parties, until the cause can be finally heard. Nice and doubtful questions were properly not determined on the preliminary hearing under ex parte affidavits, and those questions will not be reviewed here.

(a) There was no abuse of discretion in the qualified sanction of this bill.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, J.

The order of the chancellor upon this application for injunction, though not in the terms of complainants prayee, keeps the subject matter in dispute in the position ip which it was found when the bill was brought, and protects every interest of the contending parties, until the cause can be finally heard. Nice and doubtful questions were properly not determined on the preliminary hearing under ex parte affidavits, and those questions will not be reviewed here.

(a) There was no abuse of discretion in the qualified sanction of this bill.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leak-v-smith-ga-1886.