Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Leak v. Defino-Nastasi

Leak v. Defino-Nastasi

78 A.3d 1070, 621 Pa. 445, 2013 WL 5827032, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2553
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 30, 2013
DocketNo. 127 EM 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.3d 1070 (Leak v. Defino-Nastasi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leak v. Defino-Nastasi, 78 A.3d 1070, 621 Pa. 445, 2013 WL 5827032, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2553 (Pa. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.3d 1070, 621 Pa. 445, 2013 WL 5827032, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leak-v-defino-nastasi-pa-2013.