Leahy v. Spaulding

U.S. Circuit Court

Leahy v. Spaulding

19 F. 417, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2061

DecidedJanuary 22, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 19 F. 417 (Leahy v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leahy v. Spaulding, 19 F. 417, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2061 (uscirct 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The only question in this case is whether certain shawls imported by the plaintiff and which were classed as “wearing apparel, silk chief value,” and charged with duty at the rate of 60 per cent, ad valorem, were improperly so classed and should have been classed as “shawls, cotton chief value,” and charged with duty at 35 per cent, ad valorem. The proof shows, without dispute, that much the larger component in value of these shawls is cotton. According to the proof the value of these shawls was 15 shillings and 6 pence each, while, if all cotton, they would have only cost 14 shillings each, thus showing that they contained only a very small proportion of silk, and that their value was not increased over 1 shilling and 6 pence by the silk they contain.

The issues will be found for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

The only question in this case is whether certain shawls imported by the plaintiff and which were classed as “wearing apparel, silk chief value,” and charged with duty at the rate of 60 per cent, ad valorem, were improperly so classed and should have been classed as “shawls, cotton chief value,” and charged with duty at 35 per cent, ad valorem. The proof shows, without dispute, that much the larger component in value of these shawls is cotton. According to the proof the value of these shawls was 15 shillings and 6 pence each, while, if all cotton, they would have only cost 14 shillings each, thus showing that they contained only a very small proportion of silk, and that their value was not increased over 1 shilling and 6 pence by the silk they contain.

The issues will be found for the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 F. 417, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leahy-v-spaulding-uscirct-1884.