Leah Renee Proctor v. William Victor Hanna
This text of Leah Renee Proctor v. William Victor Hanna (Leah Renee Proctor v. William Victor Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00493-CV
Leah Renee Proctor, Appellant
v.
William Victor Hanna, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 33,629, HONORABLE ED MAGRE, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Leah Renee Proctor’s brief was originally due September 15, 2010.
Proctor requested and received an extension of time to file her brief until November 15, 2010. No
brief was filed. By letter dated December 14, 2010, this Court’s clerk’s office sent notice that the
brief was overdue and that, if no satisfactory response was filed by December 27, 2010, this
appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution. No brief, subsequent motion to extend time, or
other response has been filed. We dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R . App.
P. 42.3(b).
Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: January 21, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leah Renee Proctor v. William Victor Hanna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leah-renee-proctor-v-william-victor-hanna-texapp-2011.