Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services

Court of Appeals of Texas

Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 18, 2025·No. 03-25-00303-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 18, 2025

NO. 03-25-00303-CV

Leah Michal Rauhut, Appellant

v.

The City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND CRUMP DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE CRUMP

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 18, 2025

NO. 03-25-00303-CV

Leah Michal Rauhut, Appellant

v.

The City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND CRUMP DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE CRUMP

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services (Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.