Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/League v. Churchill

League v. Churchill

137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 681, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 249
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1927
Docket17160
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 800 (League v. Churchill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
League v. Churchill, 137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 681, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 249 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Under the answers to the questions certified by this court to the Supreme Court in this ease (164 Ga. 137 S. E. 632), the judge of the superior court did not err in the judgment rendered on the appeal before him in the probate proceedings. The principle of estoppel is not involved.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., eoncur. Wright & Jackson, for plaintiff in error. Callaway & Howard, William H. Fleming, Hamilton Phinizy, James S. Bussey Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spicer v. Macklin
137 S.E. 828 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 800, 36 Ga. App. 681, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/league-v-churchill-gactapp-1927.