Leaf v. Kapolinsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leaf v. Kapolinsky

338 So. 2d 884, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1976

DocketNo. 76-389

StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 884 (Leaf v. Kapolinsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leaf v. Kapolinsky, 338 So. 2d 884, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ida Leaf, as plaintiff, sued Max Kapolin-sky, her apartment house operator, Packed Sanitation Services, Inc., a corporation which services the garbage removal from the apartment house premises through a contract with Kapolinsky, and the City of Miami Beach, whose employees are alleged to have created a dangerous condition by the negligent placing of the garbage container while resurfacing the alley-way, for injuries alleged to have occurred when she attempted to put garbage in the container. The jury returned a verdict for all the defendants after a trial. On this appeal of the final judgment, points are presented urging errors in the conduct of the trial and the instructions to the jury. After considering the record in the light of the arguments presented, we find no reversible error. See Sinclair Refining Co. v. Butler, 172 So.2d 499 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); Ruiz v. Cold Storage & Insulation Contractors, Inc., 306 So.2d 153 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and see the general proposition in Bowen v. Manuel, 144 So.2d 341 (Fla.2d DCA 1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ida Leaf, as plaintiff, sued Max Kapolin-sky, her apartment house operator, Packed Sanitation Services, Inc., a corporation which services the garbage removal from the apartment house premises through a contract with Kapolinsky, and the City of Miami Beach, whose employees are alleged to have created a dangerous condition by the negligent placing of the garbage container while resurfacing the alley-way, for injuries alleged to have occurred when she attempted to put garbage in the container. The jury returned a verdict for all the defendants after a trial. On this appeal of the final judgment, points are presented urging errors in the conduct of the trial and the instructions to the jury. After considering the record in the light of the arguments presented, we find no reversible error. See Sinclair Refining Co. v. Butler, 172 So.2d 499 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); Ruiz v. Cold Storage & Insulation Contractors, Inc., 306 So.2d 153 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); and see the general proposition in Bowen v. Manuel, 144 So.2d 341 (Fla.2d DCA 1962).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 So. 2d 884, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leaf-v-kapolinsky-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack