Leaf Capital Funding, LLC v. Quality Lines, Inc., et al.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Leaf Capital Funding, LLC, Case No. 3:25-cv-2472
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER
Quality Lines, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
On March 11, 2026, the Clerk granted Plaintiff’s application for an entry of default and entered default against Defendant Ronald Smith. (Doc. Nos. 11 & 12). Then, on April 2, 2026, the Clerk granted Plaintiff’s application for an entry of default and entered default against Defendant Quality Lines, Inc. (Doc. Nos. 13 & 14). More than two months have passed since the final entry of default was filed, and Plaintiff has filed no motion for default judgment as to either Defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment or show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Should Plaintiffs choose to file a motion for default judgment, that motion must be substantively sufficient. More particularly, in the motion, Plaintiffs must at least identify allegations in the complaint that plausibly state a claim for relief and offer some development of legal arguments in support of default judgment. See, e.g., Grover v. BMW of N. Am., LLC, 581 F. Supp. 3d 930, 950 (N.D. Ohio 2022) (“[T]he Court ‘is in the business of resolving the legal arguments presented to it, not in creating a party’s inferred argument for him and then passing judgment on it.’”) (quoting Lyon v. Yellow Transp., Inc., No. 2:08-cv-464, 2009 WL 1604807, at *15 (S.D. Ohio June 8, 2009), aff’d 379 F. App’x 452 (6th Cir. 2010)). After all, when considering a motion for default judgment “the well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint are accepted as true for the purpose of determining liability, [but] the Court must still determine whether those facts are sufficient to state a claim for relief with respect to plaintiff’s claims … for which the plaintiff seeks default
judgment.” Zinganything, LLC v. Import Store, 158 F. Supp. 3d 668, 672 (N.D. Ohio 2016).
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leaf Capital Funding, LLC v. Quality Lines, Inc., et al. (Leaf Capital Funding, LLC v. Quality Lines, Inc., et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.