Leader v. Durst

24 A.D.2d 428, 260 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913

This text of 24 A.D.2d 428 (Leader v. Durst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leader v. Durst, 24 A.D.2d 428, 260 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Order entered on June 2, 1964, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the amended complaint denied. On the pleadings, in the context in which the quoted language appears, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the words “You are a liar and a thief” were or were not spoken so as to touch or be in reference to plaintiff’s trade or profession with respect either to the real estate business or as an attorney and his conduct in either capacity. We hold only that upon the basis of the facts alleged in the complaint the quoted language is actionable per se. Resolution of that question depends upon determination of the preliminary issue. The plaintiff is required to plead and prove the words were spoken in reference to his trade or profession and also that they referred to his conduct in such trade or profession. (Gurtler v. Union Parts Mfg. Co., 285 App. Div. 643; Jordan v. Lewis, 20 A D 2d 773; 1 Harper and James, Torts, p. 381 et seq.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gurtler v. Union Parts Manufacturing Co.
285 A.D. 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 428, 260 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leader-v-durst-nyappdiv-1965.