Leacock v. Johns
This text of Leacock v. Johns (Leacock v. Johns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6065
GARNETT R. LEACOCK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TRACY W. JOHNS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02149-BO)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.
Garnett R. Leacock, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Thompson, BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Garnett R. Leacock, a former federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2006) petition and his motion seeking reconsideration of
that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Leacock v. Johns, No. 5:07-hc-02149-BO
(E.D.N.C. July 9, 2008 & Nov. 12, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leacock v. Johns, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leacock-v-johns-ca4-2009.