Leach v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Leach v. State

106 So. 920, 21 Ala. App. 681

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 1925

Docket4 Div. 98.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 920 (Leach v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leach v. State, 106 So. 920, 21 Ala. App. 681 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The charge against appellant was that “he did own and operate a motor truck upon a highway in the state, without having first paid for and taken out a license therefor, in the manner provided by Mw, contrary to law.” The court has read the evidence en banc, and we are of the opinion that the allegations of the complaint were not proved, and that the general affirmative charge in his favor should have been given at appellant’s request. For the error in its refusal, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The charge against appellant was that “he did own and operate a motor truck upon a highway in the state, without having first paid for and taken out a license therefor, in the manner provided by Mw, contrary to law.” The court has read the evidence en banc, and we are of the opinion that the allegations of the complaint were not proved, and that the general affirmative charge in his favor should have been given at appellant’s request. For the error in its refusal, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 920, 21 Ala. App. 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-state-alactapp-1925.