Leach v. Smith
This text of Leach v. Smith (Leach v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1748
GEORGE R. LEACH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL S. SMITH; JAMES L. SIMMONS; MARLENE L. SIMMONS; VIRGINIA STATE BAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:06-cv-00155-JBF)
Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 17, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George R. Leach, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Steven Smith, Appellee Pro Se; Michael Lowell Heikes, HEIKES & RUGLESS, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia; Stephen Michael Hall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George R. Leach appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Leach v. Smith, No.
4:06-cv-00155-JBF (E.D. Va. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leach v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-smith-ca4-2007.