Leach v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Leach v. Smith

258 F. App'x 526

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2007·No. No. 07-1748·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George R. Leach appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the ¡district court. See Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF, 2007 WL 2155742 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

George R. Leach appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the ¡district court. See Leach v. Smith, No. 4:06-cv-00155-JBF, 2007 WL 2155742 (E.D.Va. July 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Leach v. Smith, 258 F. App'x 526 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

258 F. App'x 526 (Leach v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related