Leach v. Drake

33 Mass. 203
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1834
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Mass. 203 (Leach v. Drake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leach v. Drake, 33 Mass. 203 (Mass. 1834).

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Probate. Warren and Eliot, moved that the appeal be dismissed, because a bond to prosecute it to effect, had not been given and filed in the probate office by the appellant,” as required by St. 1817, c. 190, § 7. A bond was filed, executed by Howard Lothrop and John Torrey, conditioned that the appellant should prosecute the appeal, but it was not given in his name, nor did it appear that Lothrop and Torrey were his attorneys, nor did they profess to bind him, but themselves ; and the Court held that the bond was not in compliance with the statute, and dismissed the appeal. [By Revised Stat. c. 83, § 32 et seq., no bond is required.]

Coffin and Clifford, for the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Mass. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-drake-mass-1834.