Leach v. Carlisle

267 F. 61, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2136
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 1920
DocketNo. 2772
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 267 F. 61 (Leach v. Carlisle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leach v. Carlisle, 267 F. 61, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2136 (7th Cir. 1920).

Opinion

ARSCHURER, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The question which this record presents is whether, upon the facts before him, the Postmaster General was legally warranted in the exercise of the large discretion which in such matters the statutes repose in him, through making the order complained of.

The issue which was there most warmly contested was that of the [63]*63merit of animal testicular substances as a remedy for sexual and nervous disorders. Much evidence was adduced upon this, and many authorities cited, pro and con. By many it is maintained, that they are utterly without merit, particularly when administered by the mouth, as this is, and not hypodermically, as is often the casé; and it was contended for the government that such remedies in general, and particularly when so administered, are so manifestly wanting in merit that any representations to the contrary are essentially fraudulent. On the other hand, it was contended, and some evidence tended to show, that such substances, administered as this is, have proved moré or less heneficial in some of such ailments.

Search for some clime or condition or spring or substance which would arrest human decay, and restore manly strength and vigor, is coeval with love of life and strength, and dread of decay and death. Whether wholly or partly predicated on superstition, or fact, or both, the thought is as old as the hills that to partake by way of food or otherwise of certain parts of animals will produce beneficial effect in the corresponding part in man — the brain, the heart, the stomach, and notably the testicles. There has long been more or less prevalent the practice of resorting to the testicles of animals as an article of food or medication for prolonging, restoring, or augmenting manly strength and sexual power. Among some it is believed that the lion, the tiger, the bull, and other animals of great strength are the most efficacious in this regard. The ram also has had favorable mention. In recent years scientific investigations have been conducted, with more or less beneficial result, respecting the employment of animal substances in the treatment of human ailments. Pepsin from stomachs is employed to treat some stomach troubles in persons, extracts from animal thyroid glands are used for human thyroid ailments, and other instances might be cited. Some decades since Dr. Brown-Sequard, a noted French neurologist, conducted a series of experiments on himself with hypodermic administration of animal testicular lymph, as to which he reported a very considerable degree of success; and his writings on the subject gave impetus to further experiments, and the use of such preparations in the treatment of sexual disorders and shortcomings.

[1] Considerable literature is extant upon the subject, and it appears that some physicians employ such remedies, and that many others decry their use. For some time back such substances have been made in considerable quantities, and the very testicular product in question is made and sold at least by one of the large packers, and by a number of the extensive manufacturers here and abroad, to supply any public demand for it. Under the record facts the most that could be said is that doctors and others, who might reasonably be supposed to possess expert knowledge upon the subject, disagree as to whether or not such substances have any remedial virtue.

It was not the design of these statutes to vest the Postmaster General with authority to determine between contradictory views held in apparent good faith upon a subject the merits or demerits of which may fairly be said to be a matter of opinion among those who ought [64]*64to know. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty, 187 U. S. 94, 23 Sup. Ct. 33, 47 L. Ed. 90. It would follow that, if the order herein is sustainable only upon the inefficacy and absolute want of remedial virtue of the substance which appellant sells, the injunction should have issued.

[2] But any so-called remedy, however meritorious, may in , its exploitation become the subject-matter of fraud. Indeed, it is too often seen that articles to which more or less merit is popularly ascribed are made a basis or vehicle to carry the grossest frauds, serving only to lend semblance of good faith to the scheme.

That modesty, or prudery, or whatever else it may be called, which puts a ban on frank and unrestricted reference to human sexual parts, and enfolds their mention and consideration in secrecy and shame, has given quacks and charlatans a most fruitful field for operation, of which they have not been slow to take advantage. Sometimes boldly; but often by suggestion and innuendo; they undertake to make all men believe they have symptoms of most serious sexual disorders, when, in truth, they are more often perfectly normal, and that the natural subsidence of virility (which is generally quite as certain as the flight of years) will be arrested, and the victim restored to the vigor of robust youth, and that all sexual troubles will’ be corrected, if only that particular nostrum be taken, or that plan persistently followed. He who would operate in this peculiar field of endeavor must have a special care that his scheme is not calculated to instill in men unfounded fears, or inspire in them false hopes, as a means to the end of obtaining their money.

The plan for publicity for such remedies usually comprises literature which treats entertainingly, if not always scientifically or even truthfully, of the sexual parts, points out symptoms and dangers, and has somethings to say of premature decay, loss of power, etc. And then the proposed remedy, which is given some high-sounding name, but which is usually some ordinary and easily obtainable substance, is invitingly put forth as a certain cure for conditions which in most instances require no treatment, and in most others are beyond it. There is ordinarily a warning against quacks and cheats (who are intimated to be all the other workers in the same vineyard), and there is the quite unexceptional accompaniment of glowing testimonials from grateful users. ^

Careful perusal of the literature put out by appellant to effect the sale of his tablets induces the conclusion that it does not differ materially from the old-time stuff. It is perhaps somewhat more carefully composed, with the evident purpose of avoiding some of the more glaring misrepresentations present in that which brought about the first fraud order. But the general purport is the same.

It consists in the main of a quite lengthy introductory letter, inclosing a closely printed 20-page booklet. The letter expresses the belief of “Organo Products Company” that they offer “the very best method and remedy for regaining lost sexual power.” The reader is then informed that the alluring advertisements of others who offer treatment for such ailments are intended to make every one who reads them fear[65]*65ful of his condition. The intent is evidently to impress the reader with the complete absence of such intent on the part of this concern ; the psychological effect of which apparent frankness being probably the more greatly to impress the reader with the startling statements thereafter, made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simmons v. Farley
18 F. Supp. 758 (District of Columbia, 1937)
Leach v. Carlile
258 U.S. 138 (Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 F. 61, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-carlisle-ca7-1920.