Leach v. Bynum

Court of Appeals of Texas

Leach v. Bynum

271 S.W.2d 486, 1954 Tex. App. LEXIS 2107

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedSeptember 23, 1954

DocketNo. 3209

StatusPublished

This text of 271 S.W.2d 486 (Leach v. Bynum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leach v. Bynum, 271 S.W.2d 486, 1954 Tex. App. LEXIS 2107 (Tex. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a case wherein appellant sued appellees for title and possession to certain real estate as well as for certain injunctive relief. Trial was before the Court without a jury, which rendered judgment that appellant take nothing. From this judgment appellant appealed to this Court, and caused Transcript and Statement of Facts to be filed in this Court on 14 June 1954.

Appellant did not file any brief within the time prescribed by Rule 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, nor at any time thereafter. Further, appellant has not shown or attempted to show any good cause why it has not done so; nor has appellant requested further time for filing of brief. In view of the foregoing, it is our view that the appeal should be dismissed.

Accordingly this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Rule 415, T.R. C.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a case wherein appellant sued appellees for title and possession to certain real estate as well as for certain injunctive relief. Trial was before the Court without a jury, which rendered judgment that appellant take nothing. From this judgment appellant appealed to this Court, and caused Transcript and Statement of Facts to be filed in this Court on 14 June 1954.

Appellant did not file any brief within the time prescribed by Rule 414, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, nor at any time thereafter. Further, appellant has not shown or attempted to show any good cause why it has not done so; nor has appellant requested further time for filing of brief. In view of the foregoing, it is our view that the appeal should be dismissed.

Accordingly this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Rule 415, T.R. C.P.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 S.W.2d 486, 1954 Tex. App. LEXIS 2107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-bynum-texapp-1954.