Leach v. Allen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leach v. Allen

506 So. 2d 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8042

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 6, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-2251

StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 1109 (Leach v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leach v. Allen, 506 So. 2d 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8042 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The appellant-judgment creditor failed to prove that her loss was caused by the participation of the defendant-wife in an apparent fraud on her husband’s creditor. The necessary link between the defendant’s conduct and appellant’s damage was not sufficiently established in the record to support a conclusion that the trial judge abused his discretion as the finder of fact. We therefore affirm.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The appellant-judgment creditor failed to prove that her loss was caused by the participation of the defendant-wife in an apparent fraud on her husband’s creditor. The necessary link between the defendant’s conduct and appellant’s damage was not sufficiently established in the record to support a conclusion that the trial judge abused his discretion as the finder of fact. We therefore affirm.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents without opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 1109, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-allen-fladistctapp-1987.