Leach Logistics, Inc. v. CF USA Global Holdings, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 30, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-00237·Unknown

Opinion

Jason D. Guinasso, Esq. (8478) Tyson D. League, Esq. (13366) 500 Damonte Ranch Parkway, Suite 980 Reno, NV 89521 Tel: (775) 853-8746 Fax: (775) 201-9611 jguinasso@hutchlegal.com Todd W. Prall, Esq. (9154) HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC Peccole Professional Park 10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Tel: (702) 385-2500 Fax: (702) 385-2086 tprall@hutchlegal.com Attorneys for defendant CF USA GLOBAL HOLDINGS, LLC, dba, THE COFFEE CHERRY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA LEACH LOGISTICS, INC. CASE NO.: 3:21-cv-00237-MMD-CLB Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. CF USA, INC., dba, THE COFFEE CHERRY COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendant. ___________________________________ CF USA GLOBAL HOLDINGS, LLC dba THE COFFEE CHERRY COMPANY, Counter-claimant, vs. LEACH LOGISTICS, INC. Counter-defendant. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action involves production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection is be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal. 2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged by either party or relating to either parties business, assuming such items do in fact exist. Neither party is waiving any right to object to the disclosure of the items listed below: • Any and all proprietary commercial and financial information including, without limitation, any information relating to future or proposed business services or products, technical data, source code, know-how, including any research, products, services, developments, inventions, processes, methods, techniques, designs, specifications, systems architecture, distribution, engineering, marketing plans/strategies, business plans, financial, merchandising and/or sales information, pricing information and customer lists. • Any trade secrets or other similar information, which is defined as information, including, without limitation, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, product, system, process, design, prototype, procedure, computer programming instruction or code that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by the public or any other persons who can obtain commercial or economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. Although this list is intended to be construed liberally, the Parties both reserve the right to supplement this list via stipulation during discovery. Any additional identified materials will be subject to this Stipulated Protective Order. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to: (a) the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so designated; (c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; (e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any confidential material; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must by separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this agreement; (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.3 Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party to determine whether the designating party will remove the confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is warranted. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each party or non-party that designated information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The designating party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the designating party to sanctions. If it comes to a designating party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, the designating party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement (see, e.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leach Logistics, Inc. v. CF USA Global Holdings, LLC, (D. Nev. 2021).

Leach Logistics, Inc. v. CF USA Global Holdings, LLC (Leach Logistics, Inc. v. CF USA Global Holdings, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)