Lea v. Phillips

112 So. 323, 216 Ala. 35, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 7, 1927·No. 7 Div. 690.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is by a married woman to review a decree denying relief on her bill seeking to set aside and annul a mortgage executed by her. The case does not fall within the purview of the statute (section 6138 of the Code), which provides that a married woman may, without giving security for costs, appeal from any judgment, order, or decree of any court of record subjecting any of her property to sale, etc., nor within any other provisions of that section. _ The court is, therefore, of opinion that appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted. Ex parte Johns, 209 Ala. 638, 96 So. 888.

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE, GARDNER, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lea v. Phillips, 112 So. 323, 216 Ala. 35, 1927 Ala. LEXIS 18 (Ala. 1927).

112 So. 323 (Lea v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pritchett v. Wilson
194 So. 176 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1940)
Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley Bank
144 So. 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Hildebrand v. First Nat. Bank of Fairfield
128 So. 219 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Cobb v. Reed Phosphate Co.
124 So. 94 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)