Lea-Scandrett v. State

804 So. 2d 531, 2002 WL 15573
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 2002·No. 1D00-4781·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

804 So.2d 531 (2002)

Michael A. LEA-SCANDRETT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D00-4781.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 8, 2002.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court denied on its merits the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion, which was filed while an appeal of the appellant's previous Rule 3.800(a) motion was pending in this Court. The trial court should have dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 795 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lea-Scandrett v. State, 804 So. 2d 531, 2002 WL 15573 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

804 So. 2d 531 (Lea-Scandrett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
102 So. 3d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Davis v. State
20 So. 3d 1024 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)