LE v. WM
This text of LE v. WM (LE v. WM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000871 02-SEP-2016 09:06 AM
SCWC-14-0000871
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
LE, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
VM, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000871; FC-P NO. 08-1-0012)
AMENDED ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that although the Intermediate Court of
Appeals (ICA) issued a Summary Disposition Order on June 20,
2016, the judgment on appeal had not been filed by the ICA at the
time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see
Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also
Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed August 22,
2016 is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application
pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014). (“The application shall be
filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless
the time for filing the application is extended in accordance
with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 2, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
LE v. WM, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-v-wm-haw-2016.