Le Rea v. State

113 So. 2d 414, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2608
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1959·No. No. A-494·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the Circuit Court for Marion County of the crime of grand larceny and appealed from the judgment and sentence. We find no reversible error in the record but do find sufficient substantial evidence from which the jury could lawfully find appellant guilty of the crime. Among appellant’s contentions on appeal is that he has been twice put in jeopardy for the same offense. We can find nothing in the record to substantiate this contention that he has thus been deprived of his constitutional rights, so we cannot sustain this contention.

Affirmed.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Le Rea v. State, 113 So. 2d 414, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2608 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

113 So. 2d 414 (Le Rea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smart v. Masker
113 So. 2d 414 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)