Le Pigeon v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090153b (or.tax 6-12-2009)
This text of Le Pigeon v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090153b (or.tax 6-12-2009) (Le Pigeon v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090153b (or.tax 6-12-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the returns were not submitted before August 1 of the tax year, the county assessed a penalty of 50 percent. Plaintiff was given notice of those fees by way of an omitted property notice dated February 13, 2009. The amount at issue is $996.32.
Plaintiffs representative stated that this is the first business he has owned. He stated he was unaware of the tax or the need to file a return and that he should have been earlier informed by Defendant or some other organization. When he became aware of the need to file a personal property return, he did so. *Page 2
ORS
"After August 1, a taxpayer who files a return to which this section applies or who fails to file a return shall be subject to a penalty equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the taxable personal property of the taxpayer."
Plaintiff admittedly did not file its 2007-08 return before August 1, 2007, or the 2008-09 return before August 1, 2008. Pursuant to the statute, it is responsible for a 50 percent penalty. Plaintiff claims, however, it should be excused from the penalty because of circumstances beyond its immediate control.
ORS
*Page 3ORS
305.288 (5)(b) defines what constitutes good and sufficient cause:"`Good and sufficient cause':
"(A) Means an extraordinary circumstance that is beyond the control of the taxpayer, or the taxpayer's agent or representative, and that causes the taxpayer, agent or representative to fail to pursue the statutory right of appeal; and
"(B) Does not include inadvertence, oversight, lack of knowledge, hardship or reliance on misleading information provided by any person except an authorized tax official providing the relevant misleading information."
The sole reason offered for the failure to file is lack of knowledge of the legal requirements. That specifically does not constitute a valid reason to compromise the statutory penalty.
Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the appeal is denied.
Dated this ___ day of June 2009.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on June 12,2009. The Court filed and entered this document on June 12, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Le Pigeon v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090153b (or.tax 6-12-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-pigeon-v-multnomah-county-assessor-tc-md-090153b-ortax-6-12-2009-ortc-2009.