Le Force v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Le Force v. State

1910 OK CR 111, 109 P. 1116, 3 Okla. Crim. 738, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 23, 1910

DocketA-123

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 111 (Le Force v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Force v. State, 1910 OK CR 111, 109 P. 1116, 3 Okla. Crim. 738, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

*739 PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and on January 23, 1909, was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 108 days and pay a fine of $500. No briefs have been filed. Counsel for the state has filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution We have examined the information,’ the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no ’ error which will warrant a reversal of the case. The judgment of the county court of Caddo county is therefore affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Caddo county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentence to be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*739 PEE CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Caddo county for the crime of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and on January 23, 1909, was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of 108 days and pay a fine of $500. No briefs have been filed. Counsel for the state has filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for want of prosecution We have examined the information,’ the instructions of the court, and the judgment and sentence, and we have discovered no ’ error which will warrant a reversal of the case. The judgment of the county court of Caddo county is therefore affirmed. The clerk of this court will issue mandate to the county court of Caddo county, directing said county court to cause the judgment and sentence to be enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 111, 109 P. 1116, 3 Okla. Crim. 738, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-force-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.