Le Flore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Le Flore v. State

1928 OK CR 164, 266 P. 1109, 40 Okla. Crim. 68, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 114

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 5, 1928

DocketNo. A-6401.

StatusPublished

This text of 1928 OK CR 164 (Le Flore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Flore v. State, 1928 OK CR 164, 266 P. 1109, 40 Okla. Crim. 68, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 114 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county on a charge of having possession *69 of mash and was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for SO days and to pay a fine of $50. Motion for a new trial .was filed and overruled and exceptions saved. From the judgment and sentence,. the defendant has appealed to this court. A petition in error was filed in this court on the 5th day of October, 1926.

Under the rules of this court, where an appeal is not supported by brief, and no appearance is made for the plaintiff in error, it is assumed that the plaintiff has abandoned the appeal or it is without merit.

A careful examination of the record discloses that the information charges an offense; that the evidence tends to support the charge; that the instructions of the court were fair to the plaintiff in error;- and that there were no fundamental errors affecting the rights of the defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and EDWAKDS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI