Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall
57 Cal. 269
Opinion
A writ of prohibition does not run to a ministerial officer. The acts sought to be prohibited were not judicial acts; therefore the writ of prohibition, which was issued in this case on the 26th day of August, 1879, was improperly issued.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall, 57 Cal. 269 (Cal. 1881).
57 Cal. 269 (Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Coronado v. City of San Diego
32 P. 518 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Hobart v. Tillson
5 P. 83 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Hull v. Superior Court
63 Cal. 179 (California Supreme Court, 1883)