Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall
57 Cal. 269
This text of 57 Cal. 269 (Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Le Conte v. Trustees & Marshall, 57 Cal. 269 (Cal. 1881).
Opinion
A writ of prohibition does not run to a ministerial officer. The acts sought to be prohibited were not judicial acts; therefore the writ of prohibition, which was issued in this case on the 26th day of August, 1879, was improperly issued.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Coronado v. City of San Diego
32 P. 518 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Hobart v. Tillson
5 P. 83 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Hull v. Superior Court
63 Cal. 179 (California Supreme Court, 1883)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
57 Cal. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-conte-v-trustees-marshall-cal-1881.