Le Conte v. Pendleton

New York Supreme Court

Le Conte v. Pendleton

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 76, 1 Cole. Cas. 72

DecidedApril 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 76 (Le Conte v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Conte v. Pendleton, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 76, 1 Cole. Cas. 72 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

The court, without giving any opinion on the question, whether mil tiel record was at all pleadabic in the case, granted the plaintiff the following rule, viz.

<£ Ordered, That only one of the two pleas in this 6£ cause be allowed, and that the defendant, within r,c four days after notice of this rule, do, or in default [78]*78u thereof, that the plaintiff do elect which shall be 1 “ allowed, and that the other plea shall be deemed (c disallowed.” Vide the case of Carnes v. Duncan admr. ante, p.41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court, without giving any opinion on the question, whether mil tiel record was at all pleadabic in the case, granted the plaintiff the following rule, viz.

<£ Ordered, That only one of the two pleas in this 6£ cause be allowed, and that the defendant, within r,c four days after notice of this rule, do, or in default [78]*78u thereof, that the plaintiff do elect which shall be 1 “ allowed, and that the other plea shall be deemed (c disallowed.” Vide the case of Carnes v. Duncan admr. ante, p.41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 76, 1 Cole. Cas. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-conte-v-pendleton-nysupct-1799.