Le Compte v. Adams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Le Compte v. Adams

42 App. D.C. 595, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 4, 1915

DocketNo. 914

StatusPublished

This text of 42 App. D.C. 595 (Le Compte v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Compte v. Adams, 42 App. D.C. 595, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558 (D.C. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The argument in this court has been directed to the same question, Le Compte contending that Adams’s testimony as to the construction of his first hing’e and its test has not been corroborated. The unanimity of the Patent Office tribunals puts a heavy burden upon the appellant.

The consideration of the evidence in the light of the strong argument of the appellant convinces us that there was no error in the conclusion of the Patent Office tribunals, wherefore the Commissioner’s decision must be affirmed.

It is so ordered, and that the clerk of this court certify this decision to the Commissioner of Patents. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The argument in this court has been directed to the same question, Le Compte contending that Adams’s testimony as to the construction of his first hing’e and its test has not been corroborated. The unanimity of the Patent Office tribunals puts a heavy burden upon the appellant.

The consideration of the evidence in the light of the strong argument of the appellant convinces us that there was no error in the conclusion of the Patent Office tribunals, wherefore the Commissioner’s decision must be affirmed.

It is so ordered, and that the clerk of this court certify this decision to the Commissioner of Patents. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 App. D.C. 595, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-compte-v-adams-dc-1915.