Le Brasseur v. Berthelot

602 So. 2d 965, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 1992 WL 122705
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1992
DocketNo. 90-2636
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 965 (Le Brasseur v. Berthelot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Le Brasseur v. Berthelot, 602 So. 2d 965, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 1992 WL 122705 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Harold Le Brasseur, the former husband, appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and Ida Berthelot, the former wife, cross-appeals.

As to the points raised by the husband in the main appeal, we affirm. The record contains competent substantial evidence to support the general master’s findings.

As to the cross-appeal, we reverse the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony and direct the court to reinstate the general master’s recommendation of permanent periodic alimony. The record contains competent substantial evidence to support the general master’s findings on that issue. See Bragassa v. Bragassa, 505 So.2d 556, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bragassa v. Bragassa
505 So. 2d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 965, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6638, 1992 WL 122705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-brasseur-v-berthelot-fladistctapp-1992.