Le Bow v. Le Bow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Le Bow v. Le Bow

45 A.D.2d 1009, 358 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4252

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 29, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 1009 (Le Bow v. Le Bow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Bow v. Le Bow, 45 A.D.2d 1009, 358 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by William Le Bow from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 29, 1974. Appeal dismissed, with costs. The only issue raised on this appeal by the appellant is whether the hearing court erred in ordering his commitment to jail for failing to make required support payments to the petitioner. However, the appeal is premature since the respondent was not committed to jail but instead was ordered to post a $750 cash bond or show cause why he should not be committed to jail. Therefore, even if the required cash bond is not posted the appellant will still have an opportunity to be heard on the question of whether he should be imprisoned. If at that time the Family Court determines that the appellant should be committed to jail an appeal can then be taken. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by William Le Bow from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated January 29, 1974. Appeal dismissed, with costs. The only issue raised on this appeal by the appellant is whether the hearing court erred in ordering his commitment to jail for failing to make required support payments to the petitioner. However, the appeal is premature since the respondent was not committed to jail but instead was ordered to post a $750 cash bond or show cause why he should not be committed to jail. Therefore, even if the required cash bond is not posted the appellant will still have an opportunity to be heard on the question of whether he should be imprisoned. If at that time the Family Court determines that the appellant should be committed to jail an appeal can then be taken. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 1009, 358 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-bow-v-le-bow-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack