Le Beaux v. Supermarkets General Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Le Beaux v. Supermarkets General Corp.

57 A.D.2d 608, 393 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 608 (Le Beaux v. Supermarkets General Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Beaux v. Supermarkets General Corp., 57 A.D.2d 608, 393 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 14, 1976, which is in favor of plaintiff-respondent, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict from $480,000 to $350,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount of the verdict was not warranted on this record and is excessive to the extent indicated herein. We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 14, 1976, which is in favor of plaintiff-respondent, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted with respect to the issue of damages only, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict from $480,000 to $350,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The amount of the verdict was not warranted on this record and is excessive to the extent indicated herein. We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 608, 393 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-beaux-v-supermarkets-general-corp-nyappdiv-1977.