L.C. v. The New York City Department of Education

S.D. New York

L.C. v. The New York City Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 7, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00810·Unknown

Opinion

VOL UMIEIN LT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 7/7/2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK L.C. and E.C. individually and on behalf R.C., Plaintiffs, 1:25-cv-810-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL New York City Department of Education, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 12]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above- captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 6, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: July 7, 2025 ugh ny vySHOCIL New York, NY United States’ District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VOL UMIEIN LT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: 7/7/2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK L.C. and E.C. individually and on behalf R.C., Plaintiffs, 1:25-cv-810-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL New York City Department of Education, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 12]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above- captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by August 6, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: July 7, 2025 ugh ny vySHOCIL New York, NY United States’ District Judge

L.C. v. The New York City Department of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

L.C. v. The New York City Department of Education (L.C. v. The New York City Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related