LBS Bank-New York v. Yutex, Inc.
This text of 283 A.D.2d 281 (LBS Bank-New York v. Yutex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered January 12, 2000, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant IBN’s affirmative defense premised upon the doctrine of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
[282]*282Courts of this State generally will accord recognition to judgments rendered in a foreign country under the doctrine of comity, absent a showing of fraud in the procurement of the foreign judgment or unless recognition of the judgment would offend a strong policy of New York (Greschler v Greschler, 51 NY2d 368, 376). However, since there was no final determination by the Slovene court as to the merit of plaintiff LBS’s present claim, the decision of that court cited by appellant is not entitled to res judicata effect with respect to this action. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D.2d 281, 724 N.Y.S.2d 313, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lbs-bank-new-york-v-yutex-inc-nyappdiv-2001.