L.B.G. Properties, Inc. v. Chisholm Realty Co.

524 So. 2d 510, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1877, 1988 WL 45256
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in L.B.G. Properties, Inc. v. Chisholm Realty Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 753
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 11, 1988·No. No. 87-2760·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As in our opinion in L.B.G. Properties v. Chisholm Realty Co., 522 So.2d 513, (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), we believe the appellant is essentially seeking relief that should have been addressed in a motion for rehearing or an appeal from the final judgment entered in this cause, neither of which were pursued. In the face of those admitted failures, and upon consideration of the record before us, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to set aside the judicial sale conducted pursuant to the final judgment.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L.B.G. Properties, Inc. v. Chisholm Realty Co., 524 So. 2d 510, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1877, 1988 WL 45256 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

524 So. 2d 510 (L.B.G. Properties, Inc. v. Chisholm Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

L.B.G. Properties, Inc. v. Chisholm Realty Co.
522 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)