Lb v. Department of Children and Fam.

766 So. 2d 1259, 2000 WL 1434136
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2000
Docket5D99-3351
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 766 So. 2d 1259 (Lb v. Department of Children and Fam.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lb v. Department of Children and Fam., 766 So. 2d 1259, 2000 WL 1434136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

766 So.2d 1259 (2000)

L.B., As Parent of L.B. and L.P.G., Children, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

No. 5D99-3351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

September 29, 2000.

Thomas C. Greene, Sanford, for Appellant.

James A. Sawyer, Jr., Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

L.B., mother of L.B. and L.P.G. appeals from an order declaring her children to be dependent. She correctly contends that the order is deficient because it fails to set forth findings of fact upon which the order is based.

Section 39.507(6), Florida Statutes (1999) requires that in adjudicating a child dependent, a trial judge shall state in the order the facts upon which the finding is made. Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.330(g) similarly requires the trial court to specify the facts upon which a finding of dependency was made. See M.E.G. v. Department of Children and Families, 754 So.2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); McKenzie v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 663 So.2d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Admittedly, no such findings of fact were incorporated into the dependency order appealed from.

The order appealed from is quashed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith. If the senior judge who entered the order is available and has sufficient recollection of the evidence, the order appealed from may be supplemented by findings of fact which support its conclusion and should likewise comport with Rule 8.330(g). If the senior judge is unable to reconstruct the record or is unavailable, a new hearing shall be held.

ORDER QUASHED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, and HARRIS, JJ., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.P. v. Department of Children & Families
954 So. 2d 677 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Tm v. Dept. Children and Families
813 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
SL v. Dept. of Children and Families
787 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
JCG v. Dept. of Children and Families
780 So. 2d 965 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 1259, 2000 WL 1434136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lb-v-department-of-children-and-fam-fladistctapp-2000.